Or, what Barney did that night, and
what happened after.
Basically, Barney goes to sleep, but
wakes in the night with a feeling that someone is in his room.
I like the little bits of detail that
work their way into this chapter: the Drews' home in London, for
instance, is a flat in a divided house, and it apparently does it's
share of night-time creaking. Barney is used to this waking him, and
has a whole little process for checking the room for burglars while
appearing to roll over in his sleep, and then feeling silly because
it's always just the house. The little tidbits like this make it
seem like the characters have lives outside of the novel. Yay.
Except, here in the Grey House, it's
nothing so benign. The door's slightly ajar, and SOMEONE IS IN THE
ROOM WITH A TORCH! (That's flashlight to us Americans.)
Barney's still processing this, when he
recognizes the mysterious invader's slight sniff; turning on the lamp
confirms the intruder to be Mrs. Palk. ?!?! She claims to be looking for
the cup Barney had earlier in the evening, which Jane had already
returned downstairs.
Is Mrs. Palk evil? She could have
legitimately forgotten about the cup and not want to disturb Barney, like she says (though in that case, why not retrieve the cup in the morning?). Likewise, when she earlier saw Barney with the manuscript's telescope
case, she could just have been curious about what he was doing. At
the same time, the coincidences are starting to look suspicious, and
I'm wondering if Barney's sudden sleepiness after the others left had
more to do with a busy day outside or if Mrs. Palk purposefully detained him in the house and then drugged or enchanted him it in an attempt to steal
the map.
The rest of the party arrives, and
Simon catches Barney up on their discovery of the moonlight clue.
Barney warns Simon against discussing anything in front of Mrs. Palk.
I don't care for Simon's response, and am taking five points from
Gryffindor:
“We shouldn't. She wouldn't
understand it anyway.”
This reads like a classist, sexist,
ageist, and/or region-ist dismissal (Mrs. Palk being older, a woman,
a servant, and from a small rural village instead of London), and
that's something I'd expect more from a villain than one of the
heroes. Powerful villains underestimating seemingly lowly heroes is
a staple of the whole fantasy genre. Simon could be (imprecisely)
saying that she doesn't have the background information to connect
their conversation to the manuscript and grail, but that's not how I
or Barney understand it. Barney then explains about Mrs. Palk
sneaking through his room and accuses her of wanting the map; Simon
is “skeptical” about this new information.
At breakfast the next day, the kids are
up earlier that Merry, and Mrs. Palk talks up the village festival
while they eat; she encourages them to get outside so that Merry can
sleep in after staying up so late. As Merry specifically said not to
venture out without telling him, Barney finds this suspicious; Jane
and Simon, however, disagree about Mrs. Palk being an enemy, and
decide to leave a somewhat encoded message for Merry with her:
they're taking Rufus on a walk. Merry will know that they mean
'going up to the Headland'.
I would like to recall at this moment that Jane's earlier stated an unfounded dislike of Mrs. Palk. While it
bothered me, having it act as foreshadowing makes more sense that
having Jane suddenly dismissing Barney's suspicions. Not that
everyone you dislike is evil (though so far, it's between 4/4 and 5/5
for the kids, specifically Jane), but that it seems abrupt and
out-of-character to presume this person benign, over-ruling not only
that previous dislike, but also Barney's experience of the last night and the current pressure to divide them from their protector.
Sure, it's all circumstantial, but the circumstantial evidence is
mounting rather quickly.
When the kids leave (by a gap in the
back hedge, since Bill, who chased Smon yesterday, is watching the front), Mrs.
Palk cleans up very quietly, makes some tea, and tries on her fancy
hat for the festival.
Two things that bother me here:
The first, is the use of the term “Red
Indian Headdress” to describe the feather-and-ribbon-covered
festival bonnet. The second is the focus on Mrs. Palk using the
captain's best tea cup; while not explicit about motivation, it's
depicted as somehow bad, like she's using things above her station
because Team Evil is greedy and selfish.
Despite this, I was inclined to like
her and assume naive good intentions which (coincidentally or through interference by the Dark) hinder the kids. That is, until she goes to wake up Merry and lies to him about where the
kids are. Everything's done with the same largely-polite and helpful
attitude she's always displayed before. Suddenly, it's clear that she
drove them off and was being quiet, not out of concern for Merry, but
because she wanted to separate him from the kids. She sends him off
on a wild goose chase to Truro, by way of St. Austell, then heads off
with her festival hat, smiling.
Yep, definitely working for "The Dark".
Character Update:
The “Light”
Prof. Merry Lyon: International Man of
Mystery, Archaeologist, Bad Houseguest
Simon Drew: There's hope, but he needs
to learn about not being a dismissive jerk.
Jane Drew: Hermione Granger, but
occasionally handed the idiot-ball.
Barney Drew: Lucy Pevensie, but
slightly less angelic; obsessed with King Arthur.
The “Dark”:
Mr. Withers: Fiendish antiquarian
Miss Withers: Friendly until the map
comes up
Bill Hoover: Working for the Withers,
fast runner, lousy bicyclist
Mr. Hastings: Vicar, wears black,
frightens the kids
Mrs. Palk: Seems friendly, do not
underestimate her
Unknown:
Dick Drew “Dad”: doctor, fishing
enthusiast
Ellen Drew “Mom”: artist
Miss Haverton: family friend; artist and fishing
enthusiast
Mr. Penhallow: the fisherman from chapter 1 who told Barney about Trewissick
Captain Toms: owns the Grey House, still unseen
Captain Toms: owns the Grey House, still unseen
Rufus: dog, gets along well with Barney
Vayne: skipper on the Withers' yacht; unseen
Rev. E. J. Hawes-Mellor: late vicar,
wrote a guidebook to Trewissick which used the old name “King
Mark's Head” for Kemare Head, which Merry found peculiar.
I realize I'm commenting on an old post, but:
ReplyDeleteFrom St. Austell to Truro is certainly a drive, not the least because of the winding roads. That's not a wild goose chase, that's a 'we'll see you tomorrow morning at the earliest' detour.
At least, that's my recollection from when I used to live in Cornwall.
I realize I'm commenting on an old post, but:
ReplyDeleteFrom St. Austell to Truro is certainly a drive, not the least because of the winding roads. That's not a wild goose chase, that's a 'we'll see you tomorrow morning at the earliest' detour.
At least, that's my recollection from when I used to live in Cornwall.
Thanks for the insight! That puts a rather different spin on things.
Delete