CN: Racist/colonialist imagery, abilism
We left off with the children speculating about Great-Uncle Merry's
disappearance, and chapter two starts with his re-appearance during
breakfast the next morning. He chats with Dad about the weather
(even answers a question about it!), and again demonstrates his feigned 'deafness' by ignoring Barney's inquiry about where he was last night. The
“family rule that they should never ask their mysterious
great-uncle questions about himself” is revealed, as Simon and Jane
shush Barney.
I'm seeing a divide being set in place, where Barney is given a
child-like freedom from convention (asking questions that would be
impertinent or simply 'not done' by adults, being free with his
imagination) while Jane and Simon have crossed to the adult side and
try to follow all the unwritten rules of interaction of the society
around them while assigning normal explanations to what they see.
That's not very elegantly put, I'm afraid. At any rate, this is a
fantasy book, so it's fair to guess that Barney's fantastic ideas are
nearer the truth than anyone else suspects. There will certainly be
quests and King Arthur mythos before this is over, and “Gumerry”
(Barney's old nickname for Great-Uncle Merry, which is a lot easier
to type) will have a role to play. Ditto that yacht.
Despite the non-answer, Barney persists with his questions, taking advantage of
everyone else's distraction ('Oh look, a storm!') to ask
“Gumerry...did you find it, what you were looking for?” and gets
an actual response “No, Barnabas, I didn't find it this time.”
The plot thickens. As does the weather. The kids are trapped inside
by rain (Narnia parallel?), and their parents step out of the
scene—Mom to work (painting, I assume) and Dad to visit the harbor
master. After some puttering around, in which Jane looks over the
books on hand, Simon makes paper airplanes, and Barney complains
about the rain, they get onto the subject of explorers. Simon
reveals knowledge of exploration and colonialism tropes, though he's a bit vague and/or wrong on some details, Barney asks some insightful questions (he comes across as
much more mature than Simon in this scene), and Jane suggests
exploring the house as a fun activity. The more she speaks, the more
obvious it is that she's the trio's Hermione Granger: smart and
practical. Her and Barney put together the idea of having 'provisions' on the journey, and get Mrs. Palk to provide them
with some scones, cake, and lemonade for an indoor picnic. Simon eventually joins in the game, making himself “captain of the expedition”.
Meanwhile , Barney picks up that the locals (Mrs. Palk, Mr.
Penhallow) seem to have a long history with Gumerry, aka “the
Professor.”
The kids explore the house, making up cannibals and natives and
golden treasures (lots of racist stereotypes invoked in the process). Simon is quite big on the colonialist stereotypes and takes the lead (ie, bosses
the other kids around). Barney challenges him somewhat. Jane keeps
getting to be the grey-raincloud/voice-of-reason, despite the trip
being her idea in the first place. She reminds them not to interrupt
Mom, that they aren't supposed to mess with locked things, that the
telescope case isn't theirs to play with (but obeys Simon by
re-phrasing it as part of the adventure: they're on land! with landmarks! they don't need a telescope!), and so on. Nonetheless, she
continues displaying her intelligence and observation skills:
noticing that one bedroom resembles a ship cabin and figuring that it
belongs to the Captain, deducing the existence of a passageway to the
attic. Barney helps a bit there in both cases, and it seems like the
hierarchy for useful conclusions is Jane (intelligence, observation)
> Barney (imagination, curiosity) > Simon (some knowledge and a
bit full of himself, but will go along with the others' ideas).
They all end up cooperating to shift the wardrobe (Narnia parallel!)
in the boys' bedroom, revealing a door behind it. The door leads to a
dusty ladder to the attic, which the children climb as the chapter
ends.
It feels odd note that for no one (read: Jane,
designated mature party) to remark that the attic is possibly
out-of-bounds for them. We're told, by their mother, that everything
they should stay out of has been locked up, but nonetheless not to
snoop through any clearly personal papers/belongings. While the
attic isn't locked, per se, I think being blocked by a heavy piece of
furniture demonstrates a similar intent, and is worth a least a
discussion. On the other hand, Jane got to take the lead in figuring
out where the secret door was and didn't have to be the
stick-in-the-mud. Yay! May this trend continue.
Maybe that's why she didn't remark the attic was probably out of bonds, she finally got to take the lead and she wants to enjoy it a bit.
ReplyDeleteI like that idea. And I like how Jane got more dialogue, and an active role in initiating the activities.
ReplyDelete